Let an agent find product gaps from real conversations
A founder built an agent called Seraph on Hermes. Every week it reads the public conversations on X and Reddit about agent memory that the founder joined, and ranks the topics by the replies they got. For each topic it asks whether the product solves it, and wants proof: yes, in part, no or not proven. A no becomes a note for the product side. Mid week the founder gets the three biggest gaps and decides.
Done with HermesModerate
This is a public report, not advice from Skatteetaten, NAV, Altinn or an accountant. Check figures, deadlines and decisions against the original.
What was done
A founder built an agent called Seraph on Hermes. Every week it reads the public conversations on X and Reddit about agent memory that the founder joined, and ranks the topics by the replies they got. For each topic it asks whether the product solves it, and wants proof: yes, in part, no or not proven. A no becomes a note for the product side. Mid week the founder gets the three biggest gaps and decides.
How to do it
- Paste the prompt into the tool, and replace the text in brackets with your own.
- Read the answer through. Do not send, delete or publish anything until you have seen it yourself.
- Check the original before you trust a figure, a name or a date.
Try it with Hermes
Every week, read the public conversations about [topic] that I joined on [platforms], and rank the topics by how many replies they got. For each topic, judge whether [product] solves the problem, and answer yes, in part, no or not proven, with a link as proof. Write a short note for every no. Send me the three biggest gaps every Wednesday. Do not post anything yourself. You are done when I have chosen what we build.
Replace text in brackets with your own.
@Verdana86 on X ·